Reviewed handover and lesson update

MFG-PK01-P03 · Concept training procedure draft · D1 · 29 October 2026

For the inert browser model only. Not an approved operating SOP. No physical work, production release or certification is authorised.

Equipment MFG-PK01 · model 1.0.0-concept · source: original concept, approved SOP absent.

1. Confirm equipment and task identity.

   MFG-PK01 · Packaging change-part bench. Record draft D1 and model 1.0.0-concept.

   Hold if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

2. Confirm the inert training boundary.

   For the inert browser model only. Not an approved operating SOP. No physical work, production release or certification is authorised.

   Hold if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

3. Write the previous and requested format identifiers.

   Preserve context so the next shift can interpret the note.

   Hold if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

4. Record the expert reasoning separately from approved steps.

   Do not silently turn tacit advice into an operating SOP.

   Hold if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

5. Add the key/shaft exception and source gap.

   An exception without evidence remains an open question.

   Hold if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

6. Select a proposed change to the training draft.

   Explain what learner decision the change improves.

   Hold if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

7. Attach the source revision and reuse permission.

   Both are required for a durable lesson update.

   Hold if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

8. Request task-owner and assessor review.

   The person with release authority accepts or rejects the proposal.

   Hold if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

9. Retain the previous draft revision.

   The next lesson must be traceable to the approved change.

   Hold if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

10. Close only the reviewed knowledge action.

    No automatic propagation to equipment or robot tasks occurs.

    Hold if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

11. Prepare the evidence record.

    Record observations, source revisions, holds, recovery and missing physical evidence; do not invent a result.

    Hold if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

12. Request qualified review before reuse.

    Keep this draft unapproved until the task owner accepts the sources, geometry, criteria, permissions and revision.

    Hold if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

Qualified source, geometry and procedure review required before operational reuse.