MFG-PN01-P03 | Exception response and recovery review
Concept training procedure draft · D1 · 29 October 2026
For the inert browser model only. Not an approved operating SOP. No physical work, production release or certification is authorised.
Equipment: MFG-PN01
Model: 1.0.0-concept
Source basis: Original authored concept; no approved customer/OEM SOP supplied.

01. Confirm equipment and task identity.
Evidence: MFG-PN01 · Pneumatic fault-learning panel. Record draft D1 and model 1.0.0-concept.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

02. Confirm the inert training boundary.
Evidence: For the inert browser model only. Not an approved operating SOP. No physical work, production release or certification is authorised.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

03. Compare a hypothetical device label with the circuit source.
Evidence: A mismatch is recorded as an exception.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

04. Stop the proposed instruction.
Evidence: Do not continue using a different device procedure.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

05. Record missing energy-state evidence.
Evidence: No zero-energy conclusion can be drawn from the web page.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

06. Ask the source owner for the matching circuit revision.
Evidence: Resolve applicability before any operating instruction.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

07. Keep the original symptom record.
Evidence: Recovery must not erase the initial uncertainty.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

08. Review the proposed explanation with a qualified expert.
Evidence: The training draft can capture reasoning, not a released diagnosis.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

09. Version any approved learning change.
Evidence: Preserve permission and reviewer identity outside this public concept.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

10. Keep physical work authority separate.
Evidence: No automated restart, pressure change or field intervention occurs.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

11. Prepare the evidence record.
Evidence: Record observations, source revisions, holds, recovery and missing physical evidence; do not invent a result.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.

12. Request qualified review before reuse.
Evidence: Keep this draft unapproved until the task owner accepts the sources, geometry, criteria, permissions and revision.
HOLD if: Identity, source applicability or required evidence is missing or inconsistent.